Ms Hodge has answered my MP's letter, She believes that the recent
consultation was adequate.
She says:
/".... Mr Harritt also makes the point that the consultation
exercise on the draft regulations and guidance did not meet the
guidance in the Code of Practice on Consultation. I am unable to
accept this point. First, the Code of Practice requires that we
consult widely through out [sic] the process, allowing a minimum
twelve weeks for written consultation. The consultation period
on the access to information proposals totaled four months and
the document was made widely available through the adoption
website, the DfES e-consultation site and in hard copy format.
Second, the consultation document also received significant
media coverage through the national press, television and radio
as well as in the relevant professional journals. I do however
admit that some stakeholders experienced delays in obtaining
hard copies of the consultation document and officials have
pursued these complaints with the department's distribution
company, Prolog. Where there was a significant delay in
obtaining a hard copy of the document, we allowed stakeholders
to submit their consultation responses beyond the deadline date
of 31 July./
/As I am sure Mr Harritt will appreciate, the access to
information provisions represent one of the most complex and
emotive areas of the Adoption and Children Act. That is why we
need the input of stakeholders to help shape the final document
and ensure it is clear, concise and workable. I am satisfied
that any person with an interest in adoption was given ample
opportunity to submit their views. We received a large number
of responses from a wide range of people involved in adoption -
including adoption professionals, adopted people, adoptive
parents and birth relatives. We are now looking carefully at the
comments and suggestions that have been submitted as work is
taken forward to finalise the regulations and guidance by the
end of this year. We will be providing feedback on those
responses as required by the Code of Practice...."/
If anyone disagrees with Ms Hodge that this has been an adequate
consultation or that it has complied with the Code of Practice which
was outlined at the end of the Feedback form for the consultation,
(and the same applies to the consultation on Adoption Support
Survives and Adoption Support Agencies Regulations) please make your
views known to Ms Margaret Hodge MP at
***@dfes.gsi.gov.uk and if you feel inclined to make a
formal complaint about just how poor the consultations have been
then you can make a formal complaint in the first instance to:
David Holmes, Divisional Manager,
DfES, Looked After Children Division
Room 101 Wellington House,
133-155 Waterloo Road,
London SE1 8UG.
Perhaps then she will take another look at their definition of
"stakeholders in adoption" various social work organisations may
well have been given a say, few of us who are genuinely affected by
this legislation have been.
Posted by Robin Harritt
http://harritt.net